Rocky Anderson on Global Climate Change

globalclimateheader.png

Click here for PDF version. 

Rocky Anderson believes it is well past time for non-scientists to stop debating climate science and for America’s leaders to lead on an issue that is arguably the most important challenge in the history of our species. It is time for America’s leaders to accept that:

  1.  Many of the nation’s highest-ranking military experts, past and present, have identified global climate change as a serious threat to national security;
  2. National security is not a partisan issue. Nor is the health of the environment, including the systems that support human life;
  3. Prudence requires that elected leaders at all levels of government accept their  obligation to protect the American people from unreasonable risks, in this case the risk that climate change will create significant adverse impacts, including several that are irreversible;
  4. As the nation responsible for most of the greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere today, the United States has a moral obligation to lead the world in reducing the risks of global climate change;
  5. At the same time, the world’s inevitable shift to cleaner and more sustainable resources presents an unprecedented opportunity to create new jobs and industries. Our public policies and partisan politics should not stand in the way of our ability to seize that opportunity.
  6. The President of the United States must be a tireless and uncompromising champion of the federal policy reforms necessary to meet the challenge and seize the opportunities presented by the climate issue, including the end of taxpayer subsidies for the energy resources climate scientists have found are responsible for global warming.

Rocky Anderson believes the political debate over climate science is a deliberate distraction from responsible action – a distraction encouraged and supported by individuals and corporations with a vested interest in prolonging the nation’s dependence on fossil energy. Climate change is neither a political nor an ideological issue; it is a risk-management issue. The American people understand this, because we manage risks every day, insuring our homes against fire, our health against catastrophic illness and our vehicles against accidents – all events we hope will not occur but whose possibility we must acknowledge. 

In reality, we do not need unanimity among politicians on the conclusions of climate science. We do not need make enlightened public policies contingent upon the unattainable goal of 100% scientific certainty. The policies we need to reduce America’s greenhouse gas emissions are the same as those we need to improve our energy security,  reduce our military spending, clean up the environment, protect public health, create jobs and put America back in the race to the top of the global economy. 

Rocky Anderson’s record reveals a leader who is willing to tackle the risks of global climate change head-on. During four years as Mayor of Salt Lake City, his aggressive climate protection leadership resulted in a 31% reduction in the city’s municipal greenhouse gas emissions. Rocky’s leadership was recognized with a Climate Protection Award from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, a Distinguished Service Award from the Sierra Club, a Respect the Earth Planet Defender Award and the World Leadership Award for environmental programs from the World Leadership Forum.  He was named by Business Week as one of the top 20 activists in the world on global climate change and served on Newsweek’s Global Environmental Leadership Advisory Committee. 

As President, Rocky Anderson will continue addressing climate change and America’s necessary transition to clean renewable energy. He will: 

  • Put the United States on course for a zero-net-carbon economy by mid-century. President Anderson will convene America’s top scientists, economists, and technology experts, along with leading governors and mayors, to develop a climate change mitigation roadmap with aggressive early milestones for greenhouse gas reductions. Rocky believes that because the damages and costs of climate change grow larger with each passing year, America’s plan for reductions must be front-end-loaded.
  • End all taxpayer subsidies for fossil fuels and shift the revenues to a crash program of research, development, and commercialization of clean and renewable energy resources. This includes subsidies for carbon capture and sequestration. Rocky Anderson believes the fossil energy industries are sufficiently well financed to pay for this technology on their own.
  • Insist on full funding and scientific integrity in the national climate change science program, as well as U.S. support for the ongoing research of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  • Champion a market-based approach to reducing the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, but support and defend the authority of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions if market mechanisms are not promptly put in place by Congress or prove insufficient.
  • Fully use the authorities past Congresses have granted the President to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from government operations and to aggressive goals for government use of low-carbon materials and resources. Fight for sufficient funding by Congress to make the U.S. government, including the Department of Defense, leaders in the transition to a low-carbon economy.
  • Direct appropriate federal agencies to modify their grant and loan programs to support low-carbon development and climate adaptation measures by state and local governments and the private sector.
  • Use his bully pulpit to push for greater economy-wide transparency on climate risks. For example, President Anderson will push for state insurance regulators to require that property-casualty insurance companies annually assess and report their climate-related risks – an exercise similar the Security and Exchange Commission’s guidance that publicly traded companies do the same.
  • Reinstate FEMA’s Project Impact, a program under the Clinton Administration that helped communities create public-private partnerships to prevent and respond to natural disasters.
  • Institute policies to make carbon “visible”, including carbon-impact statements for federally funded projects and carbon-impact analysis of federal agency budget requests.
  • Make the reduction of America’s carbon debt as high a priority as reducing its financial debt; and deliver a “State of the Nation’s Ecosystems” address to a joint session of Congress each Earth Day.
  • Direct the EPA and Energy Information Administration to count the carbon impact of America’s imports when they calculate U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Direct America’s National Laboratories to increase their collaboration with U.S. industry in the development of critical carbon-cutting technologies, including advanced batteries, utility-scale energy storage, cellulosic ethanol and low-wind-speed turbines
  • Make the United States a constructive and proactive leader in the effort to negotiate an effective and enforceable international treaty that reduces the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, conserves the world’s forests, and transfers clean energy technologies to developing nations.
  • Champion reforms in national transportation policy to favor funding for mass transit and non-vehicular mobility over funding for roads.
  • Direct the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Transportation to develop guidelines for designs and materials that reduce the carbon footprints and increase the resilience of America’s infrastructure, particularly as it is repaired and modernized in the years ahead.

Rocky Anderson supports the Wingspread Principles on the U.S. Response to Global Climate Change (click here to see) developed by the Presidential Climate Action Project and signed by a bipartisan group of citizens and Nobel Laureates in 2006. Rocky was an early participant in the Wingspread process and heartily endorses it. (http://www.climateactionproject.com/principles.php)

Watch Rocky's Video on the Imperative of Global Climate Change Leadership now:

Do you like this page?

Showing 7 reactions


Calvin Leman commented 2012-12-20 08:06:50 -0700 · Flag
We are in the Sixth Extinction. Only progressive people such as the Justice Party can save the planet. This is not a political issue. This is a Homo sapiens survival issue.

Please study Jeremy Rifkin’s ideas at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82eUmqdSP60&feature=share&list=UUzJ9L7XB6xA2-B9upZGi2Mw Maybe we can avoid the extinction. Germany is the most advanced country at the moment. USA the least advanced.

This link and other links are on my website (http://treegrower.org/) athttp://treegrower.org/Extinction/Extinction%201.html James Hansen has definitive data that shows the sixth extinction is insured by burning fossil fuels. The keystone pipeline will insure a calamity. We are near 400 ppm greenhouse gas in atmosphere now; if we add no more the planet will still warm, until the land and ocean and sun are in temperature equilibrium again.

Hundreds of Articles on extinction are here: http://www.mysterium.com/extinction.html All these links are at http://treegrower.org/Extinction/Extinction%201.html Why am I telling you? I have empathy for the biosphere.

Everybody can understand this emergency using simple arithmetic http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOrvGDRLT7A&feature=youtu.be Cal

PS If near Salmon, stop by. Forward this information to all who care.
Dana McGuire commented 2012-10-24 18:48:17 -0600 · Flag
Yes, Rocky Anderson. You are the only qualified presidential candidate. The president of our country must understand global warming, and the new science and timescales. You do…Thank You!
Robert Liebman commented 2012-09-24 20:30:30 -0600 · Flag
Experience shows the indirect approach hasn’t work. Just ask the big environmental groups that have been using that approach for years. There are simply no reasons to make the rapid transition away from fossil fuels that is needed to stay under 2C without directly describing what will happen if fail. Reasons such as economic competition, green jobs, etc can not get us there. Descriptions of an unrecognizable future Earth as described by climate scientists such as James Hansen are a must. Much of the world will be uninhabitable based on knowledge of past climates and predictions from computer models. That is point that needs to get through.
Scott Baker commented 2012-09-14 10:26:11 -0600 · Flag
Bob – in politics, you have to learn to get to your goals in indirect ways. Do I care if we get to lower GHG because someone embraces national self-sufficiency, more income for farmers, or any of the other top 10 reasons and doesn’t believe in Global Warming (even as we have a record ice melt in the Arctic for most of the last decade’s summer)? Not really. I just want to get there.
Scott Baker commented 2012-07-06 12:41:42 -0600 · Flag
From my article on Op Ed News: The Top 10 Reasons for Energy Independence have Little to do With Global Warming (http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Top-10-Reasons-for-Ene-by-Scott-Baker-091211-131.html):
For those who wonder how to convince resistant people we must move away from fossil fuels due to Climate Change, I have one word of advice: Don’t.

There’s actually no need. Not because Global Warming isn’t real – it is, and the overwhelming evidence is that it’s largely fueled by human actions – but because there are other reasons why we should move away from fossil fuel-based energy. The elegant thing about a multi-pronged approach like this is that you can always find some reason to convince someone with. For example, hard-core conservatives may simply refuse to believe anything people do could affect “God’s perfect world” but they are perfectly willing to accept that we should not be sending half a trillion dollars a year to foreign oil producers who mostly hate us, and who export terrorism along with their oil (#s 4-6).

1. Climate Change: Oil and Coal contribute to global warming and will only do so more as China, India etc. emulate American lifestyles. According to many scientists, we may already be past the temperature “tipping point” where runaway synergistic effects will make warming inevitable, even if we could stop all CO2 production today (which we can’t).

2. Balance of Trade: We import 70% of our oil – $500 billion/year – often from countries that hate us, fund terrorists, and buy our businesses (Citigroup) and infrastructure (Chrysler Building). This is an unsustainable transfer of wealth, which will only make America poorer. We are now paying foreign powers both what we earn personally AND what our companies earn, while they sit back and enjoy the results of their geological luck. Take a look at T. Boone Pickens’ presentation for a more realistic assessment of what exporting our wealth will do to us in 10 years. Or, take a look at post-Columbus Spain, which thought having all the gold in the new world would keep them prosperous forever and allow them to import whatever skills and goods they needed. It didn’t, and they couldn’t.

3. Green Jobs: Germany has created 250,000 new green jobs in its solar industry, which supplies 13% of its electric needs. We need to replace oil, coal and nuclear producing jobs with wind and solar installation and maintenance jobs. (It takes 10 years to build a nuclear plant and 2 years to build a solar thermal field).

4. National Security: We must not depend on foreign powers to supply us with vital energy, which is as critical to modern society as food and shelter. Even if we drill the arctic for oil (home to up to 25% of the world’s reserves, according to US Geological Survey), we will have to defend those new wells not only from nature, but from Russia, Canada, Denmark (Greenland), and others with a claim to the high north, leading to unnecessary conflict with these countries. Clearly, ANWR has never been about the tiny bit of land off northern Alaska that would supply just 2 years of oil for America; it’s been about opening up the entire Arctic to exploration. We cannot afford to defend such a large and inhospitable region from other regional players with as large or larger geological claims.

5. The Oil Curse: Countries that depend on natural resources to make money, and not people, are the most corrupt, despotic, self-righteous and anti-human rights regimes on Earth. China does not seem to care where their oil comes from, encouraging rogue states like Sudan, Iran, Burma and Venezuela, where human rights barely exist. This is a naïve and ultimately counter-productive strategy for China but not one we should be encouraging again either (see: the downfall of the Shah of Iran).

6. Military Overreach: America cannot afford to defend oil fields. The Iraq war is, at least partly, a subsidy for Big Oil. Lives are being lost and resources are being spent ($12 Billion/month) so that – maybe, eventually – we can get more oil out of Iraq (estimated to be 2 or 3 largest holder of oil reserves). Meanwhile, Iraq does not even use its own $79 billion surplus to pay for its infrastructure needs, while here in the U.S. our bridges collapse from lack of care (Minnesota) and our electrical grid blacks out.

7. Peak Oil: We are probably only seeing peak geopolitical oil, not peak geological oil, now, but it will only get more expensive to drill oil. Most estimates put peak oil within 10 years, and since global demand has exceeded earlier estimates, we may be even closer. The perversion of the OPEC dominated oil market means that they will drill LESS, not MORE, as the price goes up, since they literally collect more money than they know what to do with already, and they want to stretch out their supply. It’s only when the price of oil goes DOWN that OPEC members are tempted to cheat on their quotas because their dysfunctional economies become desperate for cash. Right now, they want to sell oil only a trickle at a time.

8. Local Environmental Damage: If we drill everywhere, we will eventually have oil wells all over the west (instead of wind turbines), and even in the (newly melted) arctic. These high-risk drilling areas will be more likely to see oil spills, soot, and CO2 damage and the further eradication of local animal (Polar Bears) and plant life. Already, regional water tables are being polluted by accidents and poisonous chemicals involved in the drilling industry. This is especially true of the Natural Gas and Coal industries, which use and pollute prodigious amounts of scarce water resources. The cost to clean up the toxic coal ash release in Harriman, Tennessee has been estimated to be as high as $800 billion, higher than President Obama’s entire stimulus bill. This “pond” was merely average out of hundreds of similar ponds located all over the south and west.

9. We eat too much oil: Oil goes into fertilizer, which goes into corn, which goes into EVERYTHING we eat, including meat. Omega 6 fatty acids (the bad kind) are higher in factory-fed beef. Omega 3 fatty acids (the good kind) are higher in grass-fed beef and almost as high as in fish, according to Michael Pollen (the Omnivore’s Dilemma). Oil-based Corn-fed meat is making us fat and raising the national health bill. Cattle, pigs, chickens live a cruel, short life in tight, economical confines because it is cheaper to make them do so than to let them live on the open range. Even an omnivore must realize there is a difference for an animal to be raised humanely and then killed for food than one that is tortured in a CAFO its entire life and then killed. Each wind turbine pays farmers $5,000-$10,000 annually and allows livestock to graze in their shade, making natural grass-fed meat economically competitive again. This synergy could make us healthier AND wean us off imported oil. It would also make our streams, rivers and the Gulf of Mexico healthier by reducing fertilizer runoff.

10. Loss of American’s position as Innovation Leader: The oil and automotive industries were born here over 100 years ago. It is time for America to lead the world into the renewable era with Zero Emission Vehicles and renewable energy. If not us, then China or some other countries will take our place and America will become a second-rate power dependent on others for everything.
Ron Benenati commented 2012-04-03 06:20:53 -0600 · Flag
The is the presidential vision America needs for this generation and for future generations. This is the presidential vision needed by America and the World.
Rocky Anderson (Admin) published this page in Issues and Solutions 2012-03-29 15:51:42 -0600